Diferencia entre revisiones de «Oscar Wilde»
Contenido eliminado Contenido añadido
m paginados |
Friedrich Nietzsche Etiqueta: editor de código 2017 |
||
Línea 173:
** Original: «Though I do not wish to flatter Wilde, I am aware that in spite of his many defects, I never for a moment doubted his greatness... People did not always realize how much truth, wisdom and seriousness were concealed under the mask of a jester».<ref>Wilde (2012), [https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&id=Pb8pnKBZizcC&q=realms#v=snippet&q=realms&f=false pp. 18-19.] Consultado el 29 de enero de 2020.</ref>
* «... Aunque se presentaba a sí mismo como el apóstol del [[placer]], la obra creada por él contiene mucho dolor. [...] En esencia, Wilde estaba llevando a cabo, da la forma más civilizada posible, una anatomía de su [[sociedad]] y un replanteamiento radical de la ética [de esa sociedad]. Conocía todos sus [[secreto]]s y sabía exponer todo su [[fingimiento]]. Junto con [[William Blake|Blake]] y [[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]], proponía que el [[bien]] y el [[mal]] no son lo que parecen, que las etiquetas [[moral]]es no pueden abarcar la [[complejidad]] del [[comportamiento]]. Su grandeza como [[escritor]] es, en parte, el resultado de su exigencia de una mayor [[simpatía]] para las [[víctima]]s de la sociedad».
** [[w:Richard Ellmann|Richard Ellmann]]
** Original: «... Though he offered himself as the apostle of pleasure, his created work contains much pain. [...] Essentially Wilde was conducting, in the most civilized way, an anatomy of his society, and a radical reconsideration of its ethics. He knew all the secrets and could expose all the pretense. Along with Blake and Nietzsche, he was proposing that good and evil are not what they seem, that moral tabs cannot cope with the complexity of behaviour. His greatness as a writer is partly the result of the enlargement of sympathy which he demanded for society's victims».<ref>Ellmann (1987), «Introduction», xii.</ref>
| |||